Kim

(PC) Fox v. Kim

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20221:20-cv-00290California649 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MICHAEL ALLAHRAE FOX, Case No. 1:20-cv-00290-DAD-BAK (GSA) (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

TO DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE

v. TO OBEY A COURT ORDER, FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES,

ERNEST ZEIGLER, AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Defendant.

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

16 On January 12, 2022, the Court issued an order regarding pending recusal. (ECF No. 52.) The Court served the notice on Plaintiff by U.S. Postal Service on the same day. On February 2, 2022, the U.S. Postal Service returned the order as undeliverable (not deliverable as addressed). To date, Plaintiff has not updated his address with the Court. As explained in the Court’s first informational order, a party appearing pro se must keep the Court advised of his current address. (ECF No. 5 at ⁋⁋ VIII(A).) Under the Local Rules, if mail directed to a pro se plaintiff at his address of record is returned by the U.S.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.