Komar

Project Sentinel v. Komar

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 18, 20221:19-cv-00708California2,567 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PROJECT SENTINEL, Case No. 1:19-cv-00708-DAD-EPG Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR ASSIGNMENT ORDER AND

ORDER RESTRAINING JUDGMENT

JEANETTE KOMAR, DEBTOR BE DENIED WITHOUT

PREJUDICE

Defendant. (ECF No. 101)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Project Sentinel’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for an assignment order and an order restraining judgment debtor. (ECF No. 101.) The matter was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 US.C. § 636 and Local Rule 302. For the following reasons, the Court recommends that the motion be denied. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff commenced this action on May 20, 2019, alleging claims against Defendants Jeanette Komar, Sarah Komar, and Meyer Komar for violations of various federal and state laws by engaging in discriminatory housing practices. (ECF No. 1.) On January 4, 2021, Meyer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.