Martinez

Martinez v. Mahoney

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 20, 20221:22-cv-00427California2,190 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GABRIEL MARTINEZ, Case No. 1:22-cv-00427-JLT-EPG 11 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER 12 v. ORDER FOR PLAINTIFF TO:

JOCELYNN DEANNA MAHONEY, (1) FILE A FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT;

OR Defendant. (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE WISHES

TO STAND ON HIS COMPLAINT

16 (ECF NO. 1)

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

20 Plaintiff Gabriel Martinez is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil action. 21 (See ECF No. 1, 4). The complaint is now before the Court for screening. 22 The Court has reviewed Plaintiff’s complaint and finds that Plaintiff fails to state any 23 cognizable claims. Plaintiff now has the following options as to how to move forward. Plaintiff 24 may file an amended complaint if he believes that additional facts would state a cognizable claim or claims. If Plaintiff files an amended complaint, the Court will screen that amended complaint in due course. Or Plaintiff may file a statement with the Court that he…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.