Crounse

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JARED M. VILLERY, Case No. 1:18-cv-01623-JLT-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF

v. MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S RULING

D. CROUNSE, et al., (Doc. No. 108) Defendants. 16 Plaintiff filed a motion to compel the production of documents from defendant Crounse. (Doc. No. 58.) The assigned magistrate judge granted the motion in part and denied it in part. (Doc. No. 104.) Plaintiff then filed a motion for reconsideration of the magistrate judge’s ruling pursuant to Local Rule 303(c). (Doc. No. 108.) For the reasons set forth below, the motion for reconsideration is DENIED. BACKGROUND The assigned magistrate judge issued a discovery and scheduling order, setting the various discovery deadlines. (Doc. No. 23.) On several more occasions, the magistrate judge modified the discovery and scheduling order. (Doc. Nos. 36, 40, 43, 54, 64, 72, 84.) Relevant…