Williams v. VibrantCare Rehabilitation, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 COLLEEN WILLIAMS, individually, No. 2:21-cv-01179-JAM-JDP and on behalf of other members of the general public similarly situated and on behalf of other aggrieved employees pursuant to ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S the California Private Attorneys MOTION TO REMAND General Act, Plaintiff, v. VIBRANTCARE REHABILITATION, INC., a California corporation; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Colleen Williams’ (“Plaintiff”) motion to remand for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Mot. to Remand (Mot.), ECF No. 12. Defendant VibrantCare Rehabilitation Inc. (“Defendant”) opposes the motion. See Opp’n, ECF No. 15. Plaintiff replied. See Reply, ECF No. 16. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion to remand.1

1 This motion was determined to be suitable for decision without oral argument. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(g). The hearing was scheduled for March 1, 2022. …