Peterson
(PC) Williams v. Peterson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
LANCE WILLIAMS, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-0019 JLT EPG (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS REQUIRING PLAINTIFF v. ) TO PAY FILING FEE IN FULL WITHIN THIRTY ) DAYS A. PETERSON, et al., ) ) (Docs. 8, 12) Defendant. ) ) )
The assigned magistrate judge found Plaintiff is subject to the three strikes bar under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). (Doc. 8 at 2-3.) The magistrate judge also found the allegations in Plaintiff’s complaint do not satisfy the “imminent danger of serious physical injury” exception to Section 1915(g). (Id. at 3-5.) The magistrate judge noted Plaintiff alleges “lack of medical care, retaliatory false Rules Violation Reports, sexual assault, failure to protect, and the conditions of confinement he was subjected to at Corcoran State Prison.” (Id. at 4.) However, the magistrate judge observed that “before filing this case, Plaintiff was…