Baraona
(PC) Puckett v. Baraona
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DURRELL ANTHONY PUCKETT, Case No. 1:21-cv-01448-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY
DEFENDANTS MARTINEZ, MEIERS, AND
v. A. CRUZ SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED
FROM THIS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO
BARAONA, et al., PROVIDE SUFFICIENT INFORMATION TO
EFFECTUATE SERVICE
Defendants. (ECF No. 17)
THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE
17 Plaintiff Durrell Anthony Puckett (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against: (1) Defendants Baraona, Burneszki, Leos, Hernandez, Diaz, and Doe 1 for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment; (2) Defendant Leos for sexual assault in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and (3) Defendants A. Ruiz, Martinez, E. Ruiz, K. Cronister, and Jane Doe Nurse for failure to protect in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On March 17, 2022,…