Vista

Williams v. Vista

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20221:21-cv-01661California373 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-1661 JLT SAB ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING THE v. ) ACTION WITH PREJUDICE ) J. VISTA, et al., ) (Doc. 13) ) Defendants. ) ) )

The assigned Magistrate Judge determined Plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claim. (Doc. 12.) The Court granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint, and informed Plaintiff that the failure to comply with the Court’s order may result in dismissal of the action, with prejudice. (Id. at 16.) After Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, the Magistrate Judge determined Plaintiff failed to comply with the Court’s order and failed to prosecute the action. Therefore, the Magistrate Judge recommended the matter be dismissed on April 1, 2022. (Doc. 13.) The Court granted Plaintiff 14 days to file objections to the Findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.