Williams v. Aetna Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
PRINCE PAUL RAYMOND WILLIAMS, ) Case No.: 1:21-cv-1583 JLT SAB ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING THE FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING THE v. ) ACTION WITH PREJUDICE ) AETNA, INC., et al., ) (Doc. 11) ) Defendants. ) ) )
On October 27, 2021, Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a complaint, seeking to proceed pro se and in forma pauperis. (Doc. 1.) The magistrate judge determined Plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claim and dismissed the complaint with leave to amend on February 18, 2022. (Doc. 10.) The Court granted Plaintiff thirty days to file an amended complaint and informed Plaintiff that the failure to comply with the Court’s order may result in dismissal of the action, with prejudice. (Id. at 14.) After Plaintiff failed to file an amended complaint, the magistrate judge determined Plaintiff failed to comply with the Court’s order and failed to prosecute the…