Harper

Harper v. Charter Communications, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20222:19-cv-00902California1,444 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 LIONEL HARPER, DANIEL SINCLAIR, No. 2:19-cv-00902 WBS DMC HASSAN TURNER, LUIS VAZQUEZ, and PEDRO ABASCAL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and all ORDER RE: MOTIONS FOR aggrieved employees, RECONSIDERATION AND INTERLOCUTORY APPEAL Plaintiffs, 16 v.

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, LLC,

18 Defendant.

20 ----oo0oo---- 21 I. Motion for Reconsideration Plaintiffs ask the court to reconsider its order compelling plaintiffs Harper, Turner, Vazquez, and Abascal to arbitration (Docket No. 202) in light of the California Court of Appeal’s recent decision in Ramirez v. Charter Communications, Inc., 75 Cal. App. 4th 365 (2d Dist. 2022). In Ramirez, that court held that Charter’s Solution Channel Agreement -- the same arbitration agreement this court enforced in its prior order -- was unenforceable due to procedural and substantive unconscionability. See id. at 373-87. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.