Warden

(PC) Rogers v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20221:18-cv-00846California1,275 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

PHILIP JAMES ROGERS, Case No. 1:18-cv-0846-JLT-BAK (HBK) (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR LEAVE TO FILE OBJECTIONS TO

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

YURIDIAN RODRIGUEZ, GRANT DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Defendant. (Doc. No. 75) 16 17 Plaintiff Philip James Rogers is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (Doc. No. 1.) This action proceeded on an Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference claim against Defendant Yuridian Rodriguez. Plaintiff requests leave to file belated objections to the undersigned’s Findings and Recommendations that the Court grant summary judgment in Defendant’s favor. (See Doc. No. 72.) I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On August 4, 2021, Defendant Rodriguez filed a motion for summary judgment based on a failure to exhaust administrative remedies. (Doc. No. 61.) Plaintiff filed a response…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.