Thompson

(HC) Gluth v. Thompson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20222:22-cv-00133California423 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID GLUTH, No. 2:22-cv-0133 AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

PAUL THOMPSON, et al., Respondents. 16 This case was opened on the basis of petitioner’s motion to consider pleadings filed in another case, which was styled as a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. ECF No. 1. By order filed January 26, 2022, petitioner was given thirty days to submit a petition and either pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 3. He was further cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. at 2. After petitioner failed to file a petition, pay the filing fee, file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, or otherwise responded to the court’s order, he was given an additional twenty-one days to comply and warned that failure to comply would result in a recommendation that this action be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.