Moffett

(PC) Bland v. Moffett

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 22, 20221:19-cv-01750California1,844 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSHUA DAVIS BLAND, Case No. 1:19-cv-01750-JLT-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DENY PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR WRIT

v. AS FRIVOLOUS

D. MOFFETT, et al., (Docs. 52 & 55)

Defendants. 14-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

16 Plaintiff Joshua Davis Bland is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Before the Court are Plaintiff’s “Original Writ for Common Law Remedy Pursuant to 28 USCA § 1333, and U.S. Judicial Act § 256 (1911), C. 231, 36 Stat. 1100” (Doc. 52) and “Writ for Adequate Remedy at Law (28 USCA SECT. 1333); Notification of Record with Attached legal Notice and Demand; and Declaration in Support of Writ for Adequate Remedy at Law” (Doc. 55) (referred to herein as “motions for writ”). I. RELEVANT PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action on December 16, 2019. (See Doc. 1.) On May 22, 2020, the 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.