(PC) Maldonado v. State of CA

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20222:21-cv-02172California550 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 BILLY RAE SHANEE MALDONADO, Case No. 2:21-cv-02172-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: v. (1) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT

SUBJECT TO A

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., RECOMMENDATION THAT HIS

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN

Defendants. FORMA PAUPERIS BE DENIED, OR (2) FILE AN AMENDED

COMPLAINT WHOSE

ALLEGATIONS MAKE A SHOWING

OF IMMINENT DANGER

16 ECF No. 1

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

19 20 Plaintiff has filed a complaint, ECF No. 1, and a request to proceed in forma pauperis, 21 ECF No. 2. He is, however, a “three-striker” within the meaning of Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). 22 He has, in other words, filed three cases that have been dismissed for failure to state a claim. 23 Plaintiff has filed at least three cases that have been dismissed for failure to state a claim: 24 (1) Maldonado v. Yates, No. 1:11-cv-01735-LJO-GSA (E.D. Cal. Jun. 13, 2013); 25 (2) Maldonado v. Trimble,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.