Meda

(PC) Miller v. Meda

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20221:22-cv-00264California559 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 NORRIS DAJON MILLER, Case No. 1:22-cv-00264-JLT-HBK Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

v. (Doc. 8) JANET MEDA; ET. AL., Defendant. 16 The magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations that Plaintiff’s motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis be denied because Plaintiff qualifies as a three-striker under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and the complaint did not contain sufficient facts to allege imminent danger of serious physical injury. (Doc. 8 at 1-8.) The magistrate judge recommended that Plaintiff be ordered to pay the full filing fee or face dismissal of the action. (Id. at 8.) The findings and recommendations contained notice that any objections were due within fourteen days. (Id. at 1,8.) Plaintiff timely filed objections on April 4, 2022, consisting of 61-pages, attaching inmate grievances thereto. (Doc. 9.) In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C), the Court has conducted a 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.