Buttner
Buttner v. Ninos
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20221:22-cv-00244California174 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 CHRISTOPHER BUTTNER, Case No. 1:22-cv-00244-JLT-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE
Vv. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE
12 MICHAEL NINOS, OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE
Defendant. (ECF No. 10) 14 On April 22, 2022, Plaintiff filed a notice of voluntary dismissal. (ECF No. 10.) In light o 16 Plaintiff's notice of dismissal, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi) 17 Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed withou 18 prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY DIRECTED to close the case and adjus 20 the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule 41(a).