(PS) The Ruth Camel, Estate v. Nash Weber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20222:22-cv-00645California637 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUTH CAMEL ESTATE, No. 2:22–cv–645–KJM–KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING REQUEST TO SEAL v. (ECF No. 6.) SHIRLEY NASH WEBER, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, who is proceeding without counsel in this action, filed a complaint and requested leave to proceed without paying the filing fee. (ECF No. 2.) See 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (authorizing the commencement of an action “without prepayment of fees or security” by a person who is unable to pay such fees). The undersigned granted plaintiff’s request, screened the complaint under Section 1915, found it lacking, and granted leave for plaintiff to file a first amended complaint. (ECF No. 4.) On April 22, plaintiff submitted her first amended complaint (“1AC”) to the Clerk of Court, but filed alongside it a request to seal the 1AC. (ECF No. 6.) Thus, the Clerk held the 1AC until the undersigned could review plaintiff’s request to seal. For the reasons that follow,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.