Spearman

(HC) Perez v. Spearman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 25, 20222:19-cv-01223California7,894 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAM PEREZ, No. 2:19-CV-1223-KJM-DMC-P Petitioner,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. M.ELIOT SPEARMAN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding with retained counsel, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, and Respondent’s answer, ECF No. 28. Petitioner did not file a traverse. Respondent has lodged the state court record, ECF No. 27. Petitioner asserts four claims: (1) there was insufficient evidence to support the jury’s true finding on the gang enhancement; (2) he was denied the opportunity to properly cross- examine a witness that invoked the Fifth Amendment privilege; (3) two jury instructions were erroneous; and (4) he received ineffective assistance of counsel. The most recent reasoned decision on the matter is from the California Court of Appeal. Having reviewed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.