(PS) Garcia v. City of Sacramento, CA, al

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20222:21-cv-00036California557 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL CARLOS GARCIA, No. 2:21–cv–36–KJM-KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER STAYING CASE v. CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, proceeding without counsel, alleges multiple causes of action against the City and County of Sacramento and individual law-enforcement officers of those entities. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff’s claims center on the conduct of officers during his 2009 arrest and detention related to the death of a Riverside County man. Defendant County moved to dismiss, arguing among other things that plaintiff’s claims are barred by the statute of limitations. (ECF Nos. 9, 10.) Therein, the County also noted plaintiff is currently being prosecuted in Riverside County Superior court for crimes stemming from the arrest in question. The individual defendants joined the County’s motion. (ECF No. 13.) Plaintiff opposed dismissal, arguing that because his original conviction was vacated and he expects the current trial to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.