Diaz

(PC) Garcia v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 26, 20221:20-cv-00669California1,195 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAMES GREGORY GARCIA, Case No. 1:20-cv-00669-DAD-BAK (EPG) (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AN RALPH M. DIAZ, et al., AMENDED COMPLAINT

Defendants. (ECF No. 19)

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff James Gregory Garcia is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to file a third amended complaint (“3AC”). (ECF No. 19.) Because Plaintiff’s lodged 3AC does not comply with Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the document is not appropriate for filing. On May 13, 2020, Plaintiff commenced this action by filing a civil rights complaint. (ECF No. 1.) On June 4, 2020, Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint (“1AC”). (ECF No. 10.) The Court screened the 1AC and determined that it failed to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.