(PS) Graham v. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARK E. GRAHAM, Case No. 2:19-cv-02429-TLN-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE
TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS
UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., ECF Nos. 4 & 32 15 Defendants.
17 On January 3, 2022, the court issued an order that continued the initial scheduling conference to April 28, 2022, and directed the parties to file status reports by no later than April 21, 2022. ECF No. 32; see ECF No. 4. Defendants timely submitted a status report. Plaintiff, however, failed to file his own status report. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403…