Bal

(PC) Hollis v. Bal

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20222:13-cv-02145California2,045 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARVIN GLENN HOLLIS, Case No. 2:13-cv-02145-MCE-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

v. INJUNCTIVE RELIEF BE DENIED J. BAL, et al., ECF No. 87 Defendants. ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S

MOTION FOR AN EXTENSION OF TIME

AND TO MODIFY THE SCHEDULING

ORDER AND DENYING HIS MOTION FOR

A PROTECTIVE ORDER ECF Nos. 93 & 100 19 Plaintiff has three motions pending before this court. First, he moves to enjoin officials to provide him with adequate supplies of paper with which to litigate his case. ECF No. 87; see also ECF No. 92 (supplementing plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief). Second, plaintiff has filed a motion both to modify the October 4, 2021 scheduling order and to extend the deadline to respond to defendants’ discovery requests, again citing his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.