(HC) Van den Heuvel v. El Dorado Prison Holding Facility South Lake Tahoe

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20222:22-cv-00231California351 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOHN MARK VAN DEN HEUVEL, No. 2:22-CV-0231-TLN-DMC-P Petitioner,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

v. EL DORADO PRISON HOLDING

FACILITY SOUTH LAKE TAHOE,

15 Respondent.

17 Petitioner, a parolee proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, ECF Nos. 7, 13, 14. Petitioner has not submitted an affidavit required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a) showing that Petitioner is unable to prepay fees and costs or give security therefor. To the contrary, the affidavits submitted by Petitioner indicate that Petitioner is employed and earns $1,385.00 per month in gross wages. See e.g. ECF No. 7, pg. 1. It thus appears that Petitioner is able to pre-pay the $5.00 filing fee for this habeas action. / / / / / / / / / / / / Based on the foregoing, the undersigned recommends that Petitioner’s motions, Nos. 7, 13, 14,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.