(PC) Beaton v. Valley State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20221:20-cv-00005California1,906 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAUL NIVARD BEATON, No. 1:20-cv-00005-DAD-JLT (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

RECONSIDERATION, GRANTING MOTION

v. FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, VACATING

PRIOR ORDER ADOPTING AND AGAIN

VALLEY STATE PRISON and J. ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

VALENZUELA-QUEZADA, RECOMMENDATIONS UPON

RECONSIDERATION Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 59, 61, 63, 64) 17 18 Plaintiff Paul Nivard Beaton is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 10, 2021, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted due to plaintiff’s failure to exhaust his administrative remedies prior to filing suit as…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.