Petree

Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. v. Petree

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 27, 20222:18-cv-03274California6,111 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARTHUR J. GALLAGHER & CO., No. 2:18-cv-03274-JAM-KJN Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ROBERT PETREE, et al., Defendants. 16 Insurance broker Arthur J. Gallagher & Co. (“AJG” or “Plaintiff”) initiated the present action following the resignation of its former employee, Robert Petree (“Petree”), who took a job at AJG’s competitor, HUB International Insurance Services Inc. (“HUB”). Compl., ECF No. 1. AJG brings the following claims against Petree and HUB (collectively “Defendants”): (1) mistaken receipt against Petree only; (2) breach of implied-in-fact contract against Petree only; (3) misappropriation of trade secrets in violation of the California Uniform Trade Secrets Act (“CUTSA”); (4) violation of the Defend Trade Secrets Act (“DTSA”); (5) breach of the purchase agreement against Petree only; (6) breach of the employment agreement against Petree only; and (7) breach of the employment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.