Tate

(PC) Womack v. Tate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 28, 20221:19-cv-00614California1,393 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODNEY JEROME WOMACK, Case No. 1:19-cv-00614-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO COMPEL AS MOOT

v. (ECF No. 55)

TATE, et al., ORDER EXTENDING DEADLINE FOR

PLAINTIFF TO SERVE DISCOVERY

Defendants. RESPONSES

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO MODIFY DISCOVERY AND

SCHEDULING ORDER (ECF No. 56) 18 Plaintiff’s Responses Due: June 1, 2022 Dispositive Motion Deadline: July 29, 2022

20 I. Procedural Background Plaintiff Rodney Jerome Womack (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendant Tate for deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Pursuant to the Court’s August 13, 2021 discovery and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.