Junes
(PC) Hatcher v. Junes
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JUSTIN HATCHER, A.K.A. LEXI No. 2:19-cv-0793 AC P
HATCHER,
11 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 13 JUNES, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, seeks relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The case is before the court on defendants’ motion to compel plaintiff’s discovery responses. ECF No. 36. Plaintiff failed to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition. The matter is therefore deemed submitted. See Local Rule 230(l). For the reasons stated below, defendants’ motion will be granted in part and denied in part, and plaintiff will be ordered to respond to defendants’ propounded discovery. I. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL Defendants state that on December 6, 2021, they served plaintiff with interrogatories, requests for admissions, and requests for production. ECF No. 36. Thereafter, on February 7,
Defendants also sent copies of the discovery requests to the defense attorney currently representing…