Warren

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BOBBY WARREN, et al., No. 2:21–cv–640–MCE–KJN Plaintiffs, ORDER v. (ECF No. 160.) CITY OF CHICO, et al., Defendants. 16 In January of 2022, the parties settled this case, and all claims were dismissed. (ECF No. 153.) In the settlement agreement, the parties provided for continuing jurisdiction and enforcement of the settlement with the undersigned. Thereafter, the parties negotiated over, among other things, the rules for the housing site (hereafter the “Campus”). In April, the parties requested rulings on some of the City’s proposed rules, and so the court set a hearing and ordered briefing. (ECF Nos. 160 to 166.) On April 28, 2022, the court held a hearing regarding the areas in dispute. (ECF No. 168.) Under California law, “contracts are to be interpreted according to the objective intent of the parties.” Daniels v. Aguillera, 2019 WL 95510, *3 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 3, 2019) (citing Beck v. American Health…