Kram

Kram v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 29, 20222:20-cv-02177California2,944 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 * * * 9 DAVID M. KRAM, CASE NO. 2:20-cv-02177-MCE-KJN Complaint filed:10/29/20 Plaintiff, Trial Date: not set 11 vs. STIPULATED CONFIDENTIALITY

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER ORDER

CORPORATION a/k/a AMTRAK, a District of Columbia corporation, 14 Defendants.

COME NOW plaintiff, DAVID M. KRAM, and defendant, NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORPORATION, doing business as AMTRAK (hereinafter “Amtrak”), by and through their respective counsel, and stipulate to the Court signing and entering this Stipulated Confidentiality Order. 1. Scope. All materials produced or adduced in the course of discovery, including initial disclosures, responses to discovery requests, deposition testimony and exhibits, and information derived directly therefrom (hereinafter collectively “documents”), shall be subject to this Order concerning Confidential Information as defined below. This Order is subject to the Local Rules of this Court and the Federal Rules…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.