(HC)Linville
(HC)Linville v. Matteson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARTIN LINVILLE, No. 2:22-cv-0057 AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
UNKNOWN, Respondent. 15 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 7. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On January 18, 2022, the court ordered petitioner to file a petition on the court’s form and to either pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 3. Petitioner was given thirty days to do so. Thereafter, in February 2022, petitioner requested and was granted a sixty-day extension of time to file the petition and either pay the filing fee or file an application to proceed in forma pauperis. See ECF Nos. 5, 6. At that time, petitioner was cautioned that failure to comply with the court’s orders would result in…