Kiebler

(HC) Chappell v. Kiebler

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20222:22-cv-00259California939 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BLAKE CHAPPELL, No. 2:22-cv-0259 AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

B. KIEBLER, WARDEN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks habeas relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 and has requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF Nos. 1, 5. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Under Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, this court is required to conduct a preliminary review of all petitions for writ of habeas corpus filed by state prisoners. The court must summarily dismiss a petition “[i]f it plainly appears from the petition and any attached exhibits that the petitioner is not entitled to relief in the district court.” Rule 4. Here, petitioner brings a single claim of sentencing error under California law. ECF No. 1 at 5…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.