(PS)Laipply

(PS)Laipply v. Laipply

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20222:21-cv-01905California3,408 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 THOMAS DANIEL LAIPPLY and No. 2:21-cv-01905-KJM-CKD PS

EVANGELINA STAR LAIPPLY,

12 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. (ECF No. 8) THOMAS CHARLES LAIPPLY, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiffs Thomas Daniel Laipply and Evangelina Star Laipply proceed pro se in this diversity action asserting state law claims against defendants Thomas C. Laipply, Laurel Laipply, Heidi C. Raveling, Kathryn M. Saavedra, and Jaime Z. Saaveedra. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiffs bring claims relating to an alleged unlawful eviction in 2019 of the plaintiffs from a West Sacramento, California home owned by defendants Thomas C. Laipply and Laurel Laipply. This matter is before the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 302(c)(21). Defendants’ motion to dismiss for insufficient service of process (ECF No. 8) is before the court. The parties appeared via videoconference for a hearing on April 27, 2022. Attorney Gerrit Schulze…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.