Eaton

(PC) Sanford v. Eaton

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20221:20-cv-00792California6,826 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBERT L. SANFORD, Case No. 1:20-cv-00792-JLT-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION FOR

v.

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

EATON, et al., (ECF No. 33) Defendants.

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

Plaintiff Robert L. Sanford (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s original complaint was not screened because Plaintiff requested leave to amend. (Doc. 12.) Plaintiff was granted leave to amend. The Court screened the first amended complaint, and Plaintiff was granted leave to amend. The Court screened the second amended complaint and issued findings and recommendations that the federal claims in this action be dismissed based on Plaintiff’s failure to state a cognizable claim upon which relief. (ECF No. 21.) The assigned District Judge adopted the findings and recommendations in part and dismissed the second amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.