(PC) Mundy v. Sacramento County Jail Medical Staff

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20222:22-cv-00668California1,991 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 STANLEY W. MUNDY, No. 2:22-cv-0668 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

SACRAMENTO COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL STAFF, et al., 14 Defendants.

16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims officials have failed to adequate treat his medical needs and seeks immediate injunctive relief related to his transfer away from Pleasant Valley State Prison (“PVSP”). Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) and his complaint for screening (ECF No. 1). For the reasons set forth below, the court will recommend that the complaint be dismissed as duplicative and the motion to proceed in forma pauperis be denied as moot. SCREENING I. Legal Standards The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.