Bird

(PC) Cunningham v. Bird

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 2, 20221:22-cv-00306California2,764 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 RAYSHUN CUNNINGHAM, ) Case No.: 1:22-cv-00306-JLT-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION v. ) RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF ACTION

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE

BIRD, et al., ) CLAIM FOR RELIEF ) Defendants. ) (ECF No. 1) ) ) ) 17 Plaintiff Rayshun Cunningham is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s complaint filed March 26, 2022. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to state a claim on which relief…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.