Doe
Doe v. City of Elk Grove
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JANE DOE, No. 2:21-cv-02278-TLN-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER v. CITY OF ELK GROVE, ELK GROVE
POLICE DEPARTMENT, GABRIEL
RAMOS, and DOES 1 to 5, Defendants. 17 This matter is before the Court on Mark E. Merin and Paul H. Masuhara’s (collectively, “Plaintiff’s counsel”) Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff Jane Doe (“Plaintiff”). (ECF No. 6.) No opposition has been filed. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion. The local rules of this district require an attorney who would withdraw and leave his or her client without representation to obtain leave of court upon a noticed motion. E.D. Cal. L.R. 182(d). Local Rule 182(d) also requires an attorney to provide notice to the client and all other parties who have appeared, and an affidavit stating the current or last known address of the client. Id. Finally, to comply with Local Rule 182(d), the attorney must conform to the requirements of the…