(PC) Hepner v. County of Tulare
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROGER HEPNER, Case No. 1:18-cv-00774-DAD-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff,
13 v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SECOND AMENDED COUNTY OF TULARE, et al., COMPLAINT 15 Defendants. 16 (ECF No. 45) __________________________________
NICHOLAS O’NEAL,
18 Cross-Claimant, 19 v. 20 COUNTY OF TULARE, et al.,
Cross-Defendants.
23 Currently pending before the Court is Plaintiff Roger Hepner’s (“Plaintiff”) motion for 24 leave to file a Second Amended Complaint. (ECF No. 45.) The motion is unopposed. The Court 25 found the matter suitable for decision without the need for oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 26 230(g). (Doc. No. 58.) Having considered the motion as well as the record in this case, 27 Plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend shall be GRANTED. 28 I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed this action on June 6, 2018, naming the County of Tulare, the Tulare County Sheriff, and unknown Tulare County…