(PS) Crenshaw v. The Arbors at Antelope

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARL CRENSHAW and FELICIA No. 2:22-cv-000711 TLN AC PS

HAMILTON,

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER v.

THE ARBORS AT ANTELOPE,

15 Defendant.

17 Plaintiff Carl Crenshaw is proceeding in this action pro se on behalf of himself and purportedly on behalf of Felicia Hamilton. This matter was accordingly referred to the undersigned by E.D. Cal. 302(c)(21). Plaintiff has filed a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) and has submitted the affidavit required by that statute. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1). The motion to proceed IFP will therefore be granted. I. SCREENING The federal IFP statute requires federal courts to dismiss a case if the action is legally “frivolous or malicious,” fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Plaintiff must assist the court in determining whether or not the complaint is frivolous,…