Thompson

(HC) Richter v. Thompson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20222:21-cv-01833California338 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELIJAH RICHTER, No. 21-cv-1833 KJM CKD P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS PAUL THOMPSON, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. On February 9, 2022, respondent filed a motion to dismiss. On March 23, 2022, petitioner was ordered to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the pending motion within thirty days. In the same order, petitioner was informed that failure to file an opposition would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). The thirty-day period has now expired, and petitioner has not responded to the court’s order. For the foregoing reasons, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.