Lyons

(PC) Hammler v. Lyons

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20221:19-cv-01650California336 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALLEN HAMMLER, 1:19-cv-01650-AWI-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF

vs. NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT

LUCAS’S MOTION FOR TERMINATING

J. LYONS, et al., AND MONETARY SANCTIONS, WITHIN

THIRTY DAYS

Defendants. (ECF No. 57.)

17 On March 4, 2022, defendant Lucas (“Defendant”) filed a motion for terminating and monetary sanctions for Plaintiff’s willful failure to participate in a deposition. (ECF No. 57.) Plaintiff Allen Hammler was required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty-one days, but has not done so. Local Rule 230(l). Local Rule 230(l) provides that the failure to oppose a motion “may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . .” The court may deem any failure to oppose Defendant’s motion as a waiver, and recommend that the motion be granted on that basis. Failure to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.