(SS) Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 3, 20221:21-cv-01704California298 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

3 4 Leann Johnson CASE NO.: 1:21-cv-01704-DAD-GSA Guardian Ad Litem on behalf of minor S.M.S, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

Plaintiff, MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

v.

KILOLO KIJAKAZI, acting Commissioner of Social Security,

10 Defendant.

The parties stipulate to a 60-day extension of time from May 6, 2022 to July 5, 2022 for Plaintiff to file a motion for summary judgment due to counsel’s surgery recovery and co-counsel’s obligation caring for her ill father. This is Plaintiff’s first extension. When considering whether good cause exists to modify a scheduling order, courts consider the foreseeability of the impediment to meeting the deadline and the party’s diligence in seeking the extension once it became apparent they could not meet the deadline. See Sharp v. Covenant Care LLC, 288 F.R.D. 465, 467 (S.D. Cal. 2012); Ordaz Gonzalez v. Cty. of Fresno, No. 1:18-CV- 01558-BAM, 2020 WL 2539287, at *2 (E.D. Cal.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.