(PS) Rovito v. Mather Dept. of VA Medical Center

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALESSANDRA JULIETTA ROVITO, Case No. 2:22-cv-00529-KJM-JDP (PS) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE

TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL RULES

MATHER DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL ECF No. 3 CENTER,

Defendant. 17 On March 29, 2022, defendant filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s complaint. ECF No. 3. To date, plaintiff has not filed a response. Under the court’s local rules, a responding party is required to file an opposition or statement of non-opposition to a motion no later than fourteen days after the date it was filed. E.D. Cal. L.R. 230(c). To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres. Council v.…