Camacho

(PC) Bishop v. Camacho

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20222:20-cv-01762California705 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TOR AHMADD BISHOP, Case No. 2:20-cv-01762-WBS-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS

TO COMPEL

v. ECF Nos. 58 & 59 P. CAMACHO Defendant. 16 Plaintiff has filed two discovery-related motions. ECF Nos. 58 & 59. I will deny both. In his first filing, which plaintiff styles as “Motion: Production of Documents to Defendant,” plaintiff argues the merits of his claims and explains that he wants to submit evidence to prove his allegations. ECF No. 58. He also appears to identify documents that he produced, or intends to produce, in response to defendant’s discovery request. See id. at 1, 3 (“plaintiff must oblige to the request of documents to defendants [sic] as requested,” and “plaintiff will introduce and reply to defendant [sic] documents”). It is not apparent from plaintiff’s motion what relief, if any, he seeks. Accordingly, the motion will be denied. In his second motion, plaintiff seeks to compel defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.