Pena

(PC) Davis v. Pena

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20221:22-cv-00114California1,097 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CORNELL DAVIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00114-DAD-BAK (SAB) (PC)

Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

v. DISMISS ACTION FOR FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER,

J. PENA, et al., FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL

RULES, AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Defendants.

(Doc. No. 11)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 19 Plaintiff Cornell Davis is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a complaint on January 27, 2022, along with a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) I. PROCEDURAL HISTORY On February 2, 2022, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings and recommendations for the Court to deny Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis and order Plaintiff to pay the $402 filing fee in order to proceed with this action. (ECF No. 9.) The magistrate judge found that the activity in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.