Warden

(PC) Carroll v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20221:21-cv-00821California1,154 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CRAIG CARROLL, Case No. 1:21-cv-00821-HBK Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE

v.

FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD

WARDEN, SCOTT, HOLMES,

ORDER TO ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

Defendants. (Doc. No. 6) 16 Plaintiff Craig Carroll—a state prisoner—proceeds pro se on a prisoner civil rights complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 on May 20, 2021. (Doc. No. 1). On May 20, 2021, Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Doc. No. 2), which was denied without prejudice on May 26, 2021, because Plaintiff did not use the court’s approved form, did not demonstrate indigence, and did not provide a copy of his inmate account required by § 1915. (Doc. No. 6). The Court’s May 26, 2021, Order directed Plaintiff to complete a proper in forma pauperis application or pay the requisite filing fee within 21 days. (Id.). The Court warned Plaintiff that his failure to comply with the Order would result in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.