Canterberry

Canterberry v. Siemens Mobility, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20222:20-cv-02361California1,060 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

LITTLER MENDELSON, P.C. GREGORY G. ISKANDER, Bar No. 200215 YESENIA GARCIA PEREZ, Bar No. 264880 Treat Towers 1255 Treat Boulevard, Suite 600 Walnut Creek, CA 94597 Telephone: 925.932.2468 Facsimile: 925.946.9809 5 Attorneys for Defendant SIEMENS MOBILITY INC.

WEST COAST EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS, APLC RONALD L. ZAMBRANO, Bar No. 255613 CRYSTAL F. MOHSIN, Bar No.333299 1147 South Hope Street Los Angeles, California 90015 Telephone: (213) 927-3700 Facsimile: (213) 927-3701

Attorneys for Plaintiff

TOMMY CANTERBERRY

13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SACRAMENTO DIVISION 17 TOMMY CANTERBERRY, Case No. (CASE NO. 2:20-CV-02361-KJM-

KJN)

Plaintiff,

JOINT STIPULATION TO MODIFY

v. INITIAL SCHEDULING ORDER; ORDER ACARA SOLUTIONS, INC., a New York Complaint filed: October 2, 2020 (Sacramento business organization; SIEMENS County Superior Court Case No.: 34-2020-002- MOBILITY INC., a Delaware business 86414) organization; and DOES 1-10, inclusive, 23 Defendants.

25…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.