Gipson

(PC) Michel v. Gipson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20222:21-cv-02178California841 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 FABIAN HANCY MICHEL, No. 2:21-cv-2178 WBS KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CONNIE GIPSON, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding pro se, in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff requests another 90-day extension of time to file his second amended complaint, and asks that the court appoint counsel. As discussed below, plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied, and his motion for extension of time is granted. Plaintiff claims he intentionally injured himself, and was released from the hospital to a mental health crisis bed from which he was released three days ago. He states he is having a difficult time understanding the court’s rules; he was retained in first grade, then placed in English as a second language, and then put in special ed, and was once put in the developmental disability program. The court appreciates the difficulties plaintiff is facing. However,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.