Riley

Riley v. Sheet Metal Workers International Association

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 4, 20221:22-cv-00241California2,115 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 EARL L. RILEY, III, Case No. 1:22-cv-00241-JLT-EPG 9 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION BE v. DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER LEAVE TO AMEND

SHEET METAL WORKERS

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION, (ECF No. 7)

Defendant. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE DAYS

14 15 Plaintiff Earl L. Riley, III, is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., generally alleging that Defendant Sheet Metal Workers International Association has engaged in discriminatory employment practices. (See ECF No. 1, 5, 7). Plaintiff filed his complaint on February 25, 2022. (ECF No. 1). On March 23, 2022, the Court screened the complaint and concluded that it failed to state any cognizable claims. (ECF No. 6). The Court gave Plaintiff thirty days to either file an amended complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.