(SS)Flores

(SS)Flores v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20221:20-cv-01780California4,508 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEJANDRO ALDACO FLORES, Case No. 1:20-cv-01780-EPG Plaintiff, v. FINAL JUDGMENT AND ORDER

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S SOCIAL

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY COMPLAINT

SECURITY,

(ECF Nos. 16, 17) Defendant.

17 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Alejandro Aldaco Flores’ (“Plaintiff”) 18 complaint for judicial review of an unfavorable decision by the Commissioner of the Social 19 Security Administration regarding his application for Disability Insurance Benefits. The parties 20 have consented to entry of final judgment by the United States Magistrate Judge under the 21 provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) with any appeal to the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. 22 (ECF Nos. 9-11.) 23 The Court, having reviewed the record, administrative transcript, the parties’ briefs, and 24 the applicable law, finds as follows:

I. Plaintiff’s Subjective Symptom Allegations

26 Plaintiff first argues that the Administrative Law Judge (the “ALJ”)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.