Cates

(PC) Peyton v. Cates

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMay 5, 20221:22-cv-00151California6,525 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 RAYMOND E. PEYTON, Case No. 1:22-cv-00151-JLT-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS ACTION v. BE DISMISSED WITHOUT FURTHER LEAVE TO AMEND

BRIAN CATES,

(ECF No. 17) Defendant.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE DAYS

17 Plaintiff Raymond E. Peyton is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff brings deliberate-indifference claims concerning the alleged dangers posed to him by COVID protocols and overcrowding at his prison, and an equal-protection claim based on his denial of release from prison or the granting of temporary medical parole. Defendant removed this action to federal court on February 3, 2022. (ECF No. 1). This Court twice ordered Plaintiff to amend his complaint because it failed to comply with Local Rule 220, which requires a complaint to be complete in itself without 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.